The Ogres Zilie kalni park urban forest management

Authors

  • Ieva Kraukle Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies
  • Ilze Stokmane Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies
  • Kristine Vugule Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.01

Keywords:

Urban forests, Covid 19, ecosystem services, planning documents, management of urban forestry

Abstract

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of urban forests for human well-being at a time of tight constraints, when large forests close to urban areas were in high demand. Increased use affects the management of territories. Urban forests play an important role in providing ecosystem services. Urban forests show a close link between ecosystem services and forest functions. A literature review was carried out, exploring the ecosystem services and specific urban forest services provided by such territories. This article examines the experience of the Ogres Zilie kalni during the Covid-19 pandemic, taking into account the peculiar functions of urban forests. Different types of recreation that take place in the Ogres Zilie kalni, and their impact on park management are discussed. The aim of the article is to analyse and present the challenges of urban forest governance and management under the influence of Covid-19, looking through the functions of urban forests. Taking into account the classifications of ecosystem services available in Zilie kalni, zoning and assessment of the territory have been carried out. Cartographic material has been created based on practical experience and employee interviews.
The practical experience of territory management gained during Covid-19 is important and should be taken into account in the future development of green spaces, respecting the new habits of visitors potentially affected by the pandemic, where one of the most important proposals is to develop more small localised recreation areas on smaller paths.

Author Biographies

Ieva Kraukle, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Mg. spatial development planning, Deputy Director for Tourism, The Ogre Municipality Agency “The Development Agency of the Tourism, Sports and Recreation Complex “Zilie kalni”, PhD student at the Department of Landscape Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Environment and Civil Engineering, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.

Ilze Stokmane, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Dr.oec., assistant professor and leading researcher at the Department of Landscape Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Environment and Civil Engineering, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Research interests - sustainable development and resilience, landscape democracy, emphasizing the societal dimension of landscape architecture.

Kristine Vugule, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Dr. arch., assistant professor and leading researcher, head of the Department of Landscape Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Environment and Civil Engineering, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.

References

Baskent, E. Z., Borges, J. G., Kašpar, J., et. al., A Design for Addressing Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning. Forests, vol. 11, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101108.

Endreny, T. A. Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world. Nat. Commun., vol. 9, 2018, [online 08.08.2022.]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03622-0.

Carrus, G., et al., Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 134, pp. 221–228, 2015, [Online 01.08.2022.]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022.

Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., Limb, M., People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Stud., vol. 25(6), 1988, pp. 455–473.

Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., Kaplan, S., The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol. Sci., vol. 19(12), 2008, pp. 1207–1212.

Endreny, T., Santagata, R., Perna, A. et.al. Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing. Ecol. Modell., vol. 360, 2017, pp. 328–335.

Geary, R. S., Wheeler, B., Lovell, R. et.al., A call to action: Improving urban green spaces to reduce health inequalities exacerbated by COVID-19, Prev. Med. (Baltim)., vol. Volume 145, no. 106425, 2021, [online 08.08.2022.].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743521000098?casa_token=mvofP_udPukAAAAA:iIXtkTDw7b22OiEW4sOi7zrAJjC4pcrXg6OuypP1i7FQc -JIAIRIPIu-zzlkNvw9_8GKeUBsdQ.

Honey-Roses, J., Anguelovski, V. K., Chiereh, et.al. The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions – design, perceptions and inquities,” Cities Heal., vol. Volume 5, p. Pages S263-S279, 2021, [online 01.08.2022.]. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074.

LSM.lv, Slēgta vēl virkne dabas taku un skatu torņi. LSM.lv Dzīvesstila redakcija, 2020. [online 01.08.2022.]. https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/dzive--stils/valasprieki/slegta-vel-virkne-dabas-taku-un-skatu-torni.a386564/ .

LETA, Ver vaļā purvus! Kuras purvu takas būs atvērtas no piektdienas un kuri objekti slēgti?, LETA, 2020. [online 01.08.2022.]. https://www.la.lv/ver-vala-purvus-kuras-purvu-takas-bus-atvertas-no-piektdienas-un-kuri-objekti-slegti.

[Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.

Laivins, M. Dabas parka „Ogres Zilie kalni” Dabas aizsardzības plāns 2011-2026 gadam. 2011.

Konijnendijk, C. C., Ricard, R. M., Kenney. et.al. Defining urban forestry – A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 4, no. 3–4, , 2006, pp. 93–103.

Akmar, A. A., Konijnendijk, C.C., Streetheran. et.al. Greenspace planning and management in Klang Valley, Peninsular Malaysia. Arboriculture&UrbanForestry, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 99–107, 2011, [online 10.08.2022.]. http://joa.isa-arbor.com/request.asp?.

Alvey, A. A. Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 5, no. 4, 2006, pp. 195–201.

Randrup, T. B., Konijnendijk, C., Dobbertin, M. K. et.al. The concept of urban forestry in Europe. Urban Forests and Trees. Germany: Springer, 2005, pp. 9–21.

Projektā FUTURE forest gūto atziņu piemērošana meža nozares un pašvaldības sadarbībai ilgtspējīgai attīstībai Talsu novadā. 2011. [online 10.08.2022.]. http://www.talsi.server2.alt.lv/uploads/filedir/Attistiba/FUTURE%20forest/ gala_variants_digitals.pdf

Emsis, I. Rīgas pilsētas meži un to apsaimniekošana. Rīga: LatZTIZPI, 1980.

Nefedova, V., Smirnov, E., Chizikova, V. et.al., Dabiskie rekreācijas resursi un to novērtēšanas metodes. Moskva: Lesnaja promislennost, 1980.

Likums “Par īpaši aizsargājamām dabas teritorijām.” https://likumi.lv/ta/id/59994-par-ipasi-aizsargajamam-dabas-teritorijam, 1993.

Ogres un Ikšķiles novadu pašvaldību aģentūra Tūrisma, sporta un atpūtas kompleksa Zilie kalni attīstības aģentūra Vidējā termiņa darbības stratēģija 2018.-2020. gadam. 2018, [online 05.08.2022.]. https://ziliekalni.lv/lv/par-mums/darbibas-strategija/

Ikšķiles novada pašvaldība, Ikšķiles novada pašvaldības saistošie noteikumi Nr. 18/2016, „Par kārtību, kādā izmantojama kompleksa “Zilie kalni” teritorija”. 2016, p. 6 [online 05.08.2022.]. https://ziliekalni.lv/lv/par-mums/saistosie-noteikumi/.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2022

How to Cite

Kraukle, I., Stokmane, I., & Vugule, K. (2022). The Ogres Zilie kalni park urban forest management. Landscape Architecture and Art, 21(21), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.01