Objects-memes in the architectural organization of attractive urban public spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.20.08Keywords:
objects-memes, public space, squares and parksAbstract
A methodology is proposed for the architectural organization of new and activation of existing abandoned, degrading urban spaces and their transformation into attractive public spaces through the introduction of new architectural objects-memes into them, which will bring new emotional and functional content to these places. The notions of a meme in architecture and object-meme are introduced and scientifically substantiated. The last one is proposed as a tool for activating and increasing the attractiveness of existing and new various urban public spaces and, in particular, city parks and squares. The questions that object-meme must solve for this are generalized and systematized. Based on an international sociological video experiment on the perception of different people in different urban public spaces, the characteristics of the last ones, which evoke positive emotions in most people in them, were analyzed and summarized. Recommendations are systematized on the architectural and functional organization of such spaces, in particular city squares and parks, and the placement of objects-memes in them. Approbation of the put forward theoretical provisions is presented in the conceptual projects for the creation of a new city square in the historical part of Kyiv and the revitalization of the existing degrading park in the Gran-San-Blas area in Madrid.
References
Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene. Moscow: ACT CORPUS, 2013. 512 p.
Day, C. Places of the Soul: Architecture and the Environmental Design as a Healing Art. London: Aquarian, 1990. 280 p.
Dida, O. Principles for the Creation of Attractiveness of Town’ Architectural Space. Ph.D. thesis. L’viv: “L’viv Polytechnic” National University, 2015. 286 р.
Gehl, J. Cities for People. Washington: Island Press, 2010. 280 р.
Gusev, M. Principles of formation and development of the city landscape. Ph.D. thesis. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 2021. 225 p.
Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House, 1961. 460 р.
Heidegger, M. Building Dwelling Thinking. Poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper & Row, 1971, p. 143–161.
Herzog, J., de Meuron, P., Ursprung P. Portfolio. Natural History. Zürich: Lars Muller Publishers, 2005, p. 186-201.
Holl, S. Parallax. NY: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000. 350 p.
Holovatiuk, A. Understanding the term of meme from the general and architectural point of view. Space & Form, 2020, No. 44, p. 71–78. https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2020.44.B-04
Holovatiuk, A. Semantic architectural stereotypes of the city's public space. Ph.D. thesis. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 2022. 257 p.
Husserl, E. Phenomenology. Logos, 1991, vol. 1. p. 12 – 21.
Ikonnikov, A. Art, environment, time: Aesthetic organization of the urban environment. Moscow: Sovpainter, 1985. 334 р.
Ivashko, Yu., Kuzmenko, T., Li, S., Chang P. The influence of the natural environment on the transformation of architectural style. Landscape architecture and Art. Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Agriculture, 2020, vol.15, р.98-105. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2019.15.11
Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. N Y: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. 499 р,
Leshchenko, N., Tovbych, V. Modern approaches to the revitalization of historical ex-industrial architecture. Wiadomosci Konserwatorskie. Jornal of Heritage Conservation, 2019, No. 60, p. 51–58. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-b36734f9-faad-4f87-9e20-7c75b5c4e6e3
Leshchenko, N., Tovbych, V. Revived degraded monuments of fortification architecture – potential for the historical small towns’ development. Budownictwo i Architektura, 2020, No. 19(1), p. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.906
Lynch, K. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960. 328 р.
Nas, P. Cities Full of Symbols. A Theory of Urban Space and Culture. Amsterdam: Leiden University Press, 2011. 303 p.
Norberg-Schulz, C. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. NY: Rizzoli, 1979. 216 р.
Osychenko, G. Methodological basis for the formation of the urban environment aesthetics. Dr.Sc. thesis. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 2015. 372 p.
Perez-Gomez, A., Weir D. Towards an Ethical Architecture. Vancouver: Simply Read Books, 2006. 260 р.
Rodichkin, I.D. The Architect's Quick Reference Guide: Landscape Architecture. Kyiv: Budivelnyk, 1990. 335 p.
Ruban, L. Methodological foundations of the architectural and landscape organization of coastal and water areas. Dr.Sc. thesis. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 2020. 560 p.
Siza, A. Writings on Architecture. Milan: Skira Publishing, 1997. 208 p.
Shebek, N. Theoretical bases of harmonization of the architectural environment. Dr.Sc. thesis. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 2013. 347 p.
Sosnova, N. Theoretic and Methodological Bases of Formation of Public Spaces of Ukrainian Cities. Dr.Sc. thesis. L’viv: “L’viv Polytechnic” National University, 2021. 429 р.
Zumthor, P. Atmospheres. Architectural Environments. Surrounding Objects. Basel: Birkhauser, 2006. 76 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Landscape Architecture and Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
