Framework for assessing streetscape in historic city centre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2024.25.02Keywords:
development of historic city centre, streetscape analysis, accessible public space, street infrastructureAbstract
Over time, street landscapes have changed their meaning, from significant gathering, socializing and movement places they have become intense traffic corridors dominated by street transport. Today, however, more and more people are once again beginning to identify streets as more than just corridors for movement and transport, but also as important multifunctional outdoor spaces. Social habits have also changed as the needs for a healthy and safe environment have increased, and people are increasingly choosing environmentally friendly ways of moving, active lifestyles, being outdoors, in nature. The implementation of the needs of modern society on the streets of the historic city centres is complex, influenced by a number of factors: the historical identity of the place, the historic character and elements of the streetscape that are often protected by legal acts; the needs and interests of various interested parties, including accessibility of the streetscape for people with disabilities; the growing need to solve problems of climate in cities – mitigation of heat islands, air pollution, flooding caused by intensive rainfalls, which is complicated by the lack of green areas in the historic city centre. In order to develop the most appropriate solutions for the development of historic streets, it is necessary to identify all the limiting and promotive aspects. The purpose of this study is to develop and to test the methodological framework for the research of historical streetscape as the basis for the development of public space compliant with modern requirements, by performing streetscape analysis based on public needs, historical, ecological and socioeconomic criteria. The developed methodology has been tested in the context of Terbatas Street in Riga city, Latvia. Key results from the study showed that for historic streets it is essential to identify those elements of the streetscape that can be transformed and adapted to modern requirements and societal needs, and those elements that are essential to preserve in order to maintain the historical character and identity of the place. As one of the main conclusions of the study – the overall development strategy of the historic city centre plays an important role in research and development of historic streetscape, which includes both mobility, green infrastructure, public space network, tourism development, as well as functional and ecological links with other parts of the city.
References
1. Aktuālā informācija un pārskati par vides troksni Rīgā. (n.d.). Retrieved October 23, 2024, from https://mvd.riga.lv/nozares/vides-parvalde/vides-troksnis/
2. Aktuālās Rīgas trokšņu kartes. (2021). Retrieved October 23, 2024, from https://mvd.riga.lv/nozares/vides-parvalde/videstroksnis/
3. Baltic maps. Retrieved from https://balticmaps.eu/
4. Dambis, J. (2010). Rīgas centra arhitektoniski telpiskās vides attīstība 1995-2010. Promocijas darba kopsavilkums. Rīga: RTU. 39 lpp.
5. El-Deen, A.S., Aboulsaadat, A.H., Walaa, A.N. (2024). Reviving the past: urban strategies for renovating historic commercial streets in city centers. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science. Vol. 71:155, 24 p. doi:10.1186/s44147-024-00488-6
6. Gājēju un velosatiksmes plūsmu novērtējums Rīgas vēsturiskajā centrā (2013). Retrieved November 13, 2024, from https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/gajeju_velosatiksmes_plusmas_novertejums_solvers_2013.pdf
7. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. ISLAND PRESS. 288 p.
8. Horte, O.S., Eisenman, T.S. (2020). Urban greenways: A systematic review and typology. Land. Vol. 9, No. 40. doi:10.3390/land9020040
9. Iedzīvotāju aptauja par dzīvi apkaimē.5.Centrs. (2013). Retrieved November 17, 2024, from https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/17_apkaime_brasa_atskaite.pdf
10. Inclusive mobility. A guide to best practice on access to pedestrian and transport infrastructure (2021). London: Department for Transport. 131 p.
11. Interchange best practice guidelines (2021). Mator of London. 66 p.
12. Klemm, W., B. G., Heusinkveld, S., Lenzholzer, B., van Hov, (2015). Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on thermal comfort. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 138, pp. 87–98. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.009
13. Krastiņš, J. (2012). Rīgas jūgendstila ēkas. Ceļvedis par Rīgas jūgendstila arhitektūru. Rīga: ADD Projekts. 407 p. ISBN 9789934831805
14. Krastiņš, J. (2023). Rīgas Jūgendstila ēkas. Rīga: ADD Projekts. 480 p. ISBN 9789934831850
15. Lecis, E., Grandāne I. (2024). Rīgas ielas. Labais krasts. Rīga: Jāņa sēta, Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka, Latvijas Nacionālais arhīvs. 375 p. EAN: 9789984077758
16. London cycling design standards: Cycle-friendly streets and spaces (2014). Mator of London. 356 p. Retrieved https://bicycleinfrastructuremanuals.com/manuals1/London%20Cycling%20Design%20Standards%202016_UK%20London.pdf
17. Lua, Y., Sarkarc, C., Xiaod, Y. (2018). The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: Evidence from Hong Kong. Social Science & Medicine. No.208, pp. 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022
18. Maghraoui, Al. O. (2019). Designing for urban mobility - modeling the traveler experience. Business administration. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE). Retrieved from https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02043534/document
19. Manual for streets (2007). London: Thomas Telford Publishing, Thomas Telford Ltd. 146 p. Retrieved https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e0035ed915d74e6223743/pdfmanforstreets.pdf
20. Mundher, R., Sharaa, A., Helli, M., Gao, H., Bakar, S. (2022). Visual quality assessment of historical street scenes: A case study of the first “Real” street established in Baghdad. Heritage. Vol. 5, pp. 3680–3704. doi.org/10.3390/heritage5040192
21. Novērojumi pētījumam par pilsētas vasaras ielas projektu Tērbatas ielā (2020). Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/rd_gala_atskaite.pdf
22. Pētījums Klimata pārmaiņas Latvijā un Rīgā (2016). Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://arhitekts.riga.lv/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=664&catid=134&Itemid=390
23. Rehan, R. M. Sustainable streetscape as an effective tool in sustainable urban design. HBRC Journal. Vol. 9, 2013, p. 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.03.001
24. Rīga. Tērbatas iela. Riga - Dorpater Strasse (191-) Berlin-Friedenau: Verlag Boedecker, Illustrations-Centrale. Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka. Digitāla bibliotēka. Retrieved https://digitalabiblioteka.lv/?id=oai:the.european.library.DOM:6788&q=Riga%20-%20Dorpater%20Strasse&of=1-1
25. Rīga. Tērbatas ielā 14 (n.d.) Roberts Johansons. RD PAD Arhitektūras un pilsētvides dizaina pārvaldes Kultūras mantojuma aizsardzības nodaļa. Retrieved https://www.zudusilatvija.lv/objects/object/31048/
26. Rīgas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030. gadam (2014). Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://www.rdpad.lv/strategija/
27. Rīgas kultūrvēsturisko teritoriju tematiskais plānojums (2017). Rīgas domes Pilsētas attīstības departaments. Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.rdpad.lv/rtp/tematiskieplanojumi-2/apstiprinatie/
28. Rīgas pilsētas enerģētikas un klimata rīcības plāns 2022.-2030. gadam (2021) Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://rea.riga.lv/upload/media/
29. Rīgas pilsētas gaisa kvalitātes uzlabošanas rīcības programma 2021.-2025.gadam (2021) Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://environment.lv/lv/aktualitates/sabiedriskasapspriesanas/rigas-pilsetas-gaisa-kvalitates-uzlabosanasricibas-programmas-2021-2025-gadam-projekts.html
30. Rīgas vēsturiskā centra un tā aizsardzības zonas teritorijas izmantošanas un apbūves noteikumi (2013). Rīgas domes saistošie noteikumi Nr. 38. (ar 2017.gada grozījumiem). Retrieved November 22, 2024, from https://www.rdpad.lv/par-rvc/spekaesosie-planojumi-rvc-un-ta-aizsardzibas-zona/speka-esosaisteritorijas-planojums-rvc-un-ta-aizsardzibas-zona/
31. Rīgas vēsturiskā centra un tā aizsardzības zonas teritorijas plānojums (2006). Rīgas domes Pilsētas attīstības departaments. Retrieved November 20, 2024, from https://www.rdpad.lv/rtp/rvc/rvc-planojums/
32. Streetscape Guidance (2019) Mator of London. 337 p. Retrieved https://content.tfl.gov.uk/streetscape-guidance-2022-revision-2.pdf
33. Trokšņa novērtēšanas un pārvaldības kārtība (2014). Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 16. Retrieved November 27, 2024, from https://likumi.lv/ta/id/263882-troksna-novertesanas-unparvaldibas-kartiba
34. Vasaras ielas eksperiments Tērbatas ielā. Tērbatas ielas iedzīvotāju, uzņēmēju, apmeklētāju un tiešsaistes aptauja (2020) Pieejams: https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/aptauja_terbatas.pdf
35. Vries, S., Dillen, S.M.E., Groenewegen, P.P., Spreeuwenberg P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, No.94, pp. 26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Landscape Architecture and Art

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.