Green Infrastructure Development within Urban Environment provided by Privately Owned Public Spaces

Authors

  • Ilze Stokmane Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia
  • Marta Dupate Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.08

Keywords:

Privately Owned Publicly – Accessible Spaces, Privately Owned Public Spaces, POPS

Abstract

Since the industrialisation era, there has been a trend towards radial sprawl, rapid development and concentration of people in the largest cities. Historically, people needed space outside their homes to interact and communicate to each other. In the city it was provided by public open space, forming the centres of social life. The conditions and opportunities for people to use outdoor space have also changed with changing eras and political power settings, along with the scale of development, security concerns and ownership of space in the city. The aim of the study is to explore the nature of Privately Owned Publicly – Accessible Spaces (POPS) and their potential development contribution to urban green infrastructure, developing design and planning recommendations for the development of Privately Owned Publicly – Accessible Spaces in the urban environment. The research carried out during the literature review and analysis of city plans of the cities introduced POPS program shows the relevance of the topic of private ownership of public open space in the world's major metropolises, but that it is conceptually possible to adapt it to smaller-scale urban planning, for example by applying it to private investors and developers in their requirements for new buildings and sites development.

Author Biographies

Ilze Stokmane, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia

Dr.oec., Associate professor and leading researcher at the Department of Landscape Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Environment and Civil Engineering, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Research interests – sustainable development and resilience, landscape democracy, emphasizing the societal dimension of landscape architecture.

Marta Dupate, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Mg. arch. research interests - landscape design, management and communication in townscape. Spatial context of design and green infrastructure.

References

City of Toronto. Draft Urban Design Guidelines for Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS). June, 2014 [online 21.08.2023.]. https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/official-plan-guidelines/design-guidelines/privately-owned-publicly-accessible-spaces-pops/.

Development Bureau. Public Open Space in Private Developments Design and Management Guidelines. Information Services Department Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, 2011 [online 23.08.2023.]. https://www.devb.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_582/Guidelines_English.pdf.

European Commission. “Space and the City.” Urban Data Platform Plus [online 21.08.2023.]. https://urban.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?lng=en.

Garau, P. Global Public Space Toolkit: From Global Principles to Local Policies and Practice. UN Habitat, 2015 [online 30.08.2023.]. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2019/05/global_public_space_toolkit.pdf.

Gehl, J. Cities for People. Island Press., 2010.

Integrated Planning & Public Works. Guidelines for Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Spaces (POPS). City of Waterloo, 2019 [online 21.08.2023.]. https://www.waterloo.ca/en/government/resources/Documents/Development-applications/Guidelines-for-Privately-Owned-Accessible-Spaces.pdf.

Karacor, E. K. Public vs. Private: The Evaluation of Different Space Types in Terms of Publicness Dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2016, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 51–58, doi:10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n3p51.

Kayden, J. S. Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.

Lee, D. Whose Space Is Privately Owned Public Space? Exclusion, Underuse and the Lack of Knowledge and Awareness. Urban Research & Practice, May 2022, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 366–380, doi:10.1080/17535069.2020.1815828.

Martinuzzi, C., Lahoud C. Public Space Site-Specific Assessment Guidelines to Achieve Quality Public Spaces at Neighbourhood Level. UN Habitat, 2020, p. 88 [online 21.08.2023.]. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/07/final_pssa_v.1_reviewed_compressed.pdf.

Nissen, S. Urban Transformation From Public and Private Space to Spaces of Hybrid Character. Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Oct. 2008, vol. 44, no. 6, p. 1129–49, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41132666.

NYC Department of City Plannning. New York City’s Privately Owned Public Spaces. Overview [online 30.08.2023.] https://www.nyc.gov/site/planning/plans/pops/pops.page.

United Nations. The 17 Goals [online 30.08.2023.]. https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

Whyte, W. H. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. 3rd editio, Project for Public Spaces, 2001.

World Health Organization. Urban Green Spaces: A Brief for Action. Regional Office for Europe, 2017 [online 24.08.2023.]. https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/urban_green_spaces_a_brief_for_action.pdf

Downloads

Published

20-12-2023

How to Cite

Stokmane, I., & Dupate, M. (2023). Green Infrastructure Development within Urban Environment provided by Privately Owned Public Spaces. Landscape Architecture and Art, 22(22), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.08